However back then the process was only used to cut soft materials such as food or paper.
Water jet vs laser price.
Plasma also creates some heat distortion which can be reduced by cutting under water.
The steep price is due to the expensive ultra high pressure pumps required to cut metal with water.
These costs should be relatively universal regardless of the manufacturer of your waterjet.
Finally cnc laser cutting tables are often the most expensive option.
There are several items to keep in mind when looking at the cost per hour to run a waterjet.
Can the cut material get damaged.
The cutting stream of a water jet is typically 030 040 in.
Unlike a laser cutter where the laser source is located inside the machine the work area and pump.
There s also a gap between operating costs when it comes to the water jet cutter vs laser cutter debate.
Waterjet vs laser cutting during cnc in the edm blog waterjet while the difference in news.
The benefit of the laser cutter is its ability to cut thinner material at a far higher rate of speed than the water jet.
This article explores some of the waterjet vs.
Each technique is posing its own problems when it comes to part integrity.
Waterjet technical advances have led to some overlap between these two processes but the fundamental advantages of each remain intact.
Laser advantages and disadvantages.
As for their processing tolerance it is of approximately 0 002 0 05 mm for laser cutting and 0 008 0 2 mm for water jet cutting.
The accuracy and quality of the cut.
The overall process mimics erosion in nature just at a much higher speed and concentration.
But laser can cause some heat distortion especially on thicker plate.
A high pressure pump drives the water through rigid hoses resulting in a forceful water jet a typical water jet can output between 4 to 7 kilowatts.
Again plasma comes in last place having a typical part size tolerance around 0 020 and a typical kerf width of around 0 150.
If purchased used these machines will often cost upwards of 250 000.
What is waterjet cutting.
Cost anywhere from 13 20 per hour to run.
Waterjet cutting has been used as far back as the 1930s.
This comparison by two experts reviews the basics and updates the range of applications for laser and waterjet.
In thickness of 1 4 and less the laser would be the more cost effective option when cutting metals.
Have a general range of 15 30 per hour.